{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontextmatters.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fwhy-the-conquest-isnt-a-conquest-ea8xI2CC","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Why the Conquest isn't a Conquest","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/8bd398a2-dfc3-4662-bb8a-b7e502e69031/fd0380b4-7430-48da-8e8b-46512b99661c/contextmatters-artwork.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/afc2a498-1558-423c-b42c-f5215e60fc1f\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Why the Conquest isn&apos;t a Conquest\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"In this second half of the conversation with Dr. Lawson Stone, we define lots of Hebrew vocabulary (harem, melt away, etc.), and then do a little comparative work of violent texts. Is it actually possible to say the violence in the Bible is \"mild\" compared to the texts of their neighbors? And what about the killing of \"men, women, and children\"? If violence of the Bible is unsettling for you, then welcome to this particular podcast table."}