{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdividedargument.com%2Fepisodes%2Fa-chanting-of-morrison-v-olson-AxpVzELI","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"A Chanting of Morrison v. Olson","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/9f48e94e-1ea8-4f54-a58c-27e99971f8cb/eee54104-48c1-4f2d-a7cd-5ba681b4656f/dividedargument-fotor.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/66a2ce7d-4d7a-458d-9183-8856b310fe3e\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"A Chanting of Morrison v. Olson\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"We spend most of our time on some meaty opinions on the orders list -- including separate opinions in Chapman v. Doe and Donziger v. United States -- and touch on the recent merits opinions. But first, we have an extended revisit of Cruz v. Arizona, which proves far more mysterious than we first realized."}