{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdividedargument.com%2Fepisodes%2Fmr-jurisdiction-XqDFT9eO","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Mr. Jurisdiction","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/9f48e94e-1ea8-4f54-a58c-27e99971f8cb/eee54104-48c1-4f2d-a7cd-5ba681b4656f/dividedargument-fotor.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/86f5a334-900d-45f6-91dc-a46dd67a58bf\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Mr. Jurisdiction\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"We're back to break down two of the Supreme Court's recent 5-4 opinions—Bittner v. United States, about penalties under the Bank Secrecy Act, and Cruz v. Arizona, a death penalty case about state procedures and federal jurisdiction. But first, we take a brief look back at the oral arguments in the student loan case, and a new order and jurisdictional developments in Moore v. Harper (the independent state legislature case)."}