{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdividedargument.com%2Fepisodes%2Fnatural-side-effect-bI_R4grt","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Natural Side Effect","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/9f48e94e-1ea8-4f54-a58c-27e99971f8cb/eee54104-48c1-4f2d-a7cd-5ba681b4656f/dividedargument-fotor.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/45421058-52bc-40ec-bd66-cf0662422f61\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Natural Side Effect\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"Back in the studio after a couple of fun live shows, we discover that the Court has finally given us too much to talk about. We discuss the new Trump Administration's first shadow docket adventure, a number of interesting solo opinions from the orders list, the decline in summary reversals, and the overall quality of oral advocacy before the Court. We then take a deep dive into the Court's opinion in Glossip v. Oklahoma, a capital case with many factual, jurisdictional, and remedial complexities. "}