{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdividedargument.com%2Fepisodes%2Fpoison-pill-in-your-pocket-LLrFMKCi","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Poison Pill in Your Pocket","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/9f48e94e-1ea8-4f54-a58c-27e99971f8cb/eee54104-48c1-4f2d-a7cd-5ba681b4656f/dividedargument-fotor.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/0dedff96-c6b4-4da1-98cd-ec6968467594\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Poison Pill in Your Pocket\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"We follow up on feedback, puzzle over the Court's apparent continued lack of interest in Fourth Amendment cases, and then discuss two of the latest opinions—Culley v. Marshall (civil forfeiture) and Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy (copyright). \n\nAnd yes, we know Dan's audio sounds terrible due to a technical snafu, sorry!"}