{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Finternational-security.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2F5-competing-visions-of-restraint-xVbf_8N_","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"5 – Competing Visions of Restraint","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/b7d3b22c-f1c1-4c35-878d-f889c3a1a93d/1c46c2fd-8672-4bdf-91dc-9db27ae88624/ispodcastblue.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/2c6d71de-bae3-4310-b9b3-188299edbbb6\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"5 – Competing Visions of Restraint\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"At least since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, some scholars and policymakers have called for retrenching the United States’ global military presence. Miranda Priebe and John Schuessler discuss realist, conservative, and progressive visions of restraint. They draw out the underlying beliefs that draw each group to a grand strategy of restraint and highlight the divisions between and within these groups."}