{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjudgemental-podcast.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fthe-mojanovski-decision-PS4iWtWn","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"The Mojanovski decision","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/1ed3870b-5ee2-47a3-96dc-dfab9f60e285/b3f50518-30d2-4760-9870-e52eb8b44314/judge-20mental-20podcast-thumbnail.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/33746793-e258-4f48-b7cc-0624e20f5516\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"The Mojanovski decision\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"The legal framework surrounding psychosocial risk in Australia is complicated. Often competing legal frameworks do not align and attempts to manage psychosocial harm to individual workers can create legal risks for the organisation and potentially increase the likelihood of psychosocial harm.\n\nThe Mojanovski decision involved the termination of an employee for conduct which, if proven, would have constituted serious misconduct. However, the employer's efforts to protect the alleged victim from the legal processes significantly compromised the legal proceedings."}