{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Flibservative.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fmichigan-senate-debate-reaction-show-2HpTqv2Y","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Michigan Senate Debate Reaction Show","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/027daa67-30ee-437b-bde2-cb747ff48848/43dea8a5-bf27-4e45-ba7a-8e5cc89b04ca/libservative-white.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/5870db81-00df-4489-8c33-1e0bf3c06971\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Michigan Senate Debate Reaction Show\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"Dan and Corey react to the Michigan Senate debate between Dr. Abdul El-Sayed and former Congressman/FBI agent Mike Rogers, calling it an historically lopsided beatdown backed by a WOOD TV poll (about 82–18) and noting El-Sayed leads in multiple polls and betting markets. They say Rogers looked unprepared, sweaty, and evasive, repeatedly leaning on “Muslim Brotherhood” attacks and struggling against record-based critiques (surveillance/privacy, border votes, drug pricing, donor influence). They argue El-Sayed dominated foreign policy—especially by refusing to be boxed into Iran/Israel talking points—while Rogers invoked debunked Oct. 7 claims. They fact-check claims about El-Sayed’s mother’s past nonprofit job, discuss government overreach, culture-war tactics, a DOJ “antisemitism tour” ad, Laura Loomer’s credit-card-reader freakout, and other political clips before wrapping with show plugs."}