{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnew-books-in-philosophy-of-medicine.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fclinical-judgment-CEmqnBGv","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Clinical Judgment","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/9eb206/9eb20674-dcf6-40af-a8e4-a4524978ac52/4f81a0e8-eed5-438a-9aec-c32b7174680d/6c43631ca1e9b359bd203b9b964f5822.png","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/4f81a0e8-eed5-438a-9aec-c32b7174680d\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Clinical Judgment\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"The mastery of clinical judgment is what separates the expert clinician from the novice. Yet clinical judgment remains somewhat obscure. Is it a tacit knowledge? Or one that can be formulated according to explicit rules? Is it a science? Or a virtue? Has it been replaced or its importance reduced by evidence-based medicine? Or will it soon be taken over from clinicians by intelligent machines? And what is clinical judgment, anyway?  \nIn today’s consultation, I sit down with four guests ahead of a clinical judgment symposium to see how they use philosophy to understand clinical judgment: Ross Upshur (University of Toronto), Luis Flores (King’s College London), Kathryn Montgomery (Northwestern University) and Benjamin Djulbegovic (University of South Florida).\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n  \n  \n  \n    \n      \n        \n          \n            \n          \n          \n            \n          \n        \n        \n          \n        \n        \n          \n            Clinical Judgment"}