{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpolitico-energy.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fthe-case-for-and-against-carbon-capture-vMKckIZl","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"The case for (and against) carbon capture","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/be2d3049-4f3b-4332-9bec-df8b43b108c8/431c5c8b-f7dc-4785-a528-3416dd50fbfb/20190905-politico-energy-podcast-logo.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/63a4a7f6-15a4-46bb-8786-b22e11f64d74\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"The case for (and against) carbon capture\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"Carbon capture and sequestration is a technology that can suck the carbon out of high-emitting facilities and bury it underground. Sounds like a great way to fight climate change, right? In reality, the technology is more complicated and far more controversial. Today, POLITICO’s Ben Lefebvre explains why some climate-friendly senators are willing to deploy billions of dollars to make CCS happen even though some environmental groups oppose it. "}