{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsecondary-rules.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fmazibuko-v-city-of-johannesburg-IQ7hpbyY","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/dd59855a-1588-41db-934f-70ce54c48590/c085308c-f8f2-43b4-a176-ad3f6eb49c1c/img-0164.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/9495da94-33c3-489d-bbc4-91f172136c6a\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"Water under the bridge, and judges kissing babies, in this episode of Secondary Rules. What business do Courts have thinking about socio-economic rights? Can a Constitution transform a society, and can litigation safeguard a democracy? All this and more as we consider the right to water in the Constitutional Court of South Africa. "}