{"href":"https://api.simplecast.com/oembed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthe-labor-law-insider.simplecast.com%2Fepisodes%2Fproject-labor-agreements-part-ii-0i3jABu4","width":444,"version":"1.0","type":"rich","title":"Project Labor Agreements Part II","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/ff351b78-f2f4-4ef7-b95b-fae71fd308ee/625e1ba0-06ce-498a-9d0b-0abb7e4179c1/laborlaw-album-3000.jpg","thumbnail_height":300,"provider_url":"https://simplecast.com","provider_name":"Simplecast","html":"<iframe src=\"https://player.simplecast.com/dafb7b1c-f6cb-4034-b65c-d0c15625f9cf\" height=\"200\" width=\"100%\" title=\"Project Labor Agreements Part II\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"></iframe>","height":200,"description":"In Part One related to President Biden’s Executive Order 14063 mandating Project Labor Agreements (“PLA”), our Labor Law Insiders, Tom Godar, Rufino Gaytán and Michael Schrier, began to explore the requirement that contractors and sub-contractors on large federal construction contracts “negotiate or become party to a project labor agreement with one or more appropriate labor organizations.”\n\nIn Part Two of this discussion regarding the impact of the Executive Order we explore how this requirement of PLAs for construction agreements greater than $35 million may indeed be another avenue that unions might use to organize construction employees. Our Insiders tackle the potential use of publicly available information mandated under the new PLA regulations, and how, in combination with wages dictated by the Davis-Bacon Act, unions might identify and target union-free employers for organizational activity."}